|
Post by CMF Newsman on Sept 22, 2008 6:45:21 GMT -5
WASHINGTON (AP) — Since the nation's birth, Americans have discussed race and avoided it, organized neighborhoods and political movements around it, and used it to divide and hurt people even as relations have improved dramatically since the days of slavery, Reconstruction and legal segregation. Now, in what could be a historic year for a black presidential candidate, a new Associated Press-Yahoo! News poll, conducted with Stanford University, shows just how wide a gap remains between whites and blacks. It shows that a substantial portion of white Americans still harbor negative feelings toward blacks. It shows that blacks and whites disagree tremendously on how much racial prejudice exists, whose fault it is and how much influence blacks have in politics. news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-race-in-america;_ylt=AobtGcfsPCYvcpnfCjKrFlOs0NUE
|
|
Felix
Global Moderator
Tepid One
Happy Morning
Posts: 4,137
|
Post by Felix on Sept 22, 2008 8:26:18 GMT -5
This study is the basis of a topic in the Road to the White House forum, focusing on the effect of racial attitudes on the Presidential election. Of course, racial attitudes affect everything in our society, so discussion of these general attitudes can focus on areas other than elections.
Affirmative action is one obvious battleground in debates regarding race. How justified is skewing the hiring process to compensate for past and present discrimination?
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 22, 2008 10:07:49 GMT -5
"How justified is skewing the hiring process to compensate for past and present discrimination?"
It helps make up for the public education system.
|
|
Action!
Full Forumite
Inaction never works!
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Action! on Sept 22, 2008 15:31:57 GMT -5
It's not justified at all. All job applicants should be treated equally with regard to race when it comes to hiring. It's not fair to not hire someone that is more qualified in order to hire a black person because of affirmative action rules. It's just reverse discrimination against the white applicant.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 22, 2008 15:47:56 GMT -5
The same goes for gays, too.
|
|
|
Post by gridbug on Sept 22, 2008 16:01:37 GMT -5
It should go for women too (straight or gay)
Just don't hire smokers! Never hire the smokers.
|
|
Action!
Full Forumite
Inaction never works!
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Action! on Sept 22, 2008 16:21:27 GMT -5
The same goes for gays, too. I don't remember there ever being a question on a job application asking one if they were gay or not LimitedRecourse, have you?
|
|
Action!
Full Forumite
Inaction never works!
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Action! on Sept 22, 2008 16:23:00 GMT -5
Exactly, and you can add overweight people to the list of people that I personally would not hire for a job.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 22, 2008 16:25:20 GMT -5
"Exactly, and you can add overweight people to the list of people that I personally would not hire for a job."
Or people who wear last year's fashions.
|
|
Action!
Full Forumite
Inaction never works!
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Action! on Sept 22, 2008 16:30:12 GMT -5
Or Republicans.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 22, 2008 16:31:38 GMT -5
"Or Republicans."
Well, at least you'd still hire me, then, as I'm not Republican.
|
|
Action!
Full Forumite
Inaction never works!
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Action! on Sept 22, 2008 16:33:19 GMT -5
That may be. I'd have to interview you first.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 22, 2008 16:50:12 GMT -5
After I slim down some.
|
|
|
Post by sluggo on Sept 22, 2008 18:08:19 GMT -5
So, you don't like fat people? What about a fat, gay Republican?
|
|
|
Post by Tsavodiner on Sept 22, 2008 21:58:24 GMT -5
The same goes for gays, too. I don't remember there ever being a question on a job application asking one if they were gay or not LimitedRecourse, have you? That's what the 'Chief's lounge' is for.
|
|
Kordax
Senior Forumite
Hank Rearden
Posts: 2,537
|
Post by Kordax on Sept 22, 2008 22:25:32 GMT -5
In any political race in any district, my guess is that Black voters vote for Black candidates in large percentages with a few historical exceptions. In this election cycle, I doubt that White voters will vote for the White candidate in percenatges close to the Black vote for the Black candidate....
|
|
Felix
Global Moderator
Tepid One
Happy Morning
Posts: 4,137
|
Post by Felix on Sept 23, 2008 3:44:29 GMT -5
Kordax asserts: I doubt that White voters will vote for the White candidate in percenatges close to the Black vote for the Black candidate.... [/i]Hmmmm...so the portion of the population with a long history of suffering slavery, de facto peonage, occasional victimization by lynching and other experiences denied the white population may feel inclined to support those of a similar background? I don't doubt it. Nor do I doubt that whites, who have not similarly suffered, might not feel that supporting candidates exclusively of their own race in the same percentages was necessary. Other than those whites still open or closeted racists.
|
|
|
Post by Tsavodiner on Sept 23, 2008 4:24:06 GMT -5
I dunno, Marvell, quite a few whites were lynched in the Old World for a plethora of offenses real and imagined, and if you've ever worked for minimum wage, which I have, you understand what peonage really is.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Sept 23, 2008 6:25:19 GMT -5
Think of the ten people you voluntarily hang with the most. Write them down. Denote their race next to their names. Seven of them should be white. Of the other three there should be one hispanic and one black. The tenth should be either asian, hispanic or black. If this isn't the case you are statistically showing a racial bias in choosing who to hang with. *With that being the case, look around at your co-workers. If the above ratio doesn't pan out then your work place is statistically showing a racial hiring bias. Look at who you vote for, the same applies here. There is a statistical flaw in my assertion. I'm using a population of ten because few of us regularly hang with a group larger than that. Even in the workplace one's specific workgroup rarely is larger than ten. You really need a population size of at least fifty or more for the model to work.
|
|
|
Post by el Gusano on Sept 23, 2008 8:32:48 GMT -5
We only have six blacks living in town, but I do have some Eskimo friends and my wife is hispanic.
Is that close enough?
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Sept 23, 2008 10:07:32 GMT -5
We only have six blacks living in town, but I do have some Eskimo friends and my wife is hispanic. Is that close enough? Alaskan racial demographics are probably nothing like the rest of the country's. I suspect that you may statistically be hanging around a lot more hispanics than your local demographics would suggest as being normal.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 23, 2008 10:31:25 GMT -5
"Hmmmm...so the portion of the population with a long history of suffering slavery, de facto peonage, occasional victimization by lynching and other experiences denied the white population may feel inclined to support those of a similar background?"
Yeah, and only A HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
|
|
|
Post by daworm on Sept 23, 2008 10:35:00 GMT -5
Having justification (valid or not) for racism is still racism, and still inexcusable.
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Sept 23, 2008 10:44:46 GMT -5
Having NO justification for calling someone racist is racism also.
|
|
osrb
Senior Forumite
Semper Fi
Mostly Harmless
Posts: 3,150
|
Post by osrb on Sept 23, 2008 10:51:49 GMT -5
<sarcasm?If you are white and do not vote for obama you are a racist. If you are black you are a race traitor. </sarcasm>
|
|
Kordax
Senior Forumite
Hank Rearden
Posts: 2,537
|
Post by Kordax on Sept 23, 2008 12:51:28 GMT -5
Marvell, I'm keeping a sharp eye out for any politicians of Egyptian descent; anyone who enslaved god's chosen people should be an anathema to Christian voters forever.... Forget never!
|
|
|
Post by fullphaser on Sept 23, 2008 12:57:05 GMT -5
So, you don't like fat people? What about a fat, gay Republican? Isn't that sort of a living contradiction?
|
|
|
Post by gridbug on Sept 23, 2008 13:06:09 GMT -5
Marvell, I'm keeping a sharp eye out for any politicians of Egyptian descent; anyone who enslaved god's chosen people should be an anathema to Christian voters forever.... Forget never! So if Jesus was really black, the US is doomed? Egyptian politicians do it right! Hosni Mubarak wins every time in free elections (that just have one real candidate). But then we only get two to choose from, I guess that makes us twice as free as Egypt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2008 17:32:38 GMT -5
> So if Jesus was really black...
Jesus isn't black.
Show him one of your pictures, Bob.
|
|
osrb
Senior Forumite
Semper Fi
Mostly Harmless
Posts: 3,150
|
Post by osrb on Sept 23, 2008 17:40:29 GMT -5
he was an Arab.
Jews came from the fertile crescent following Abraham. They were Arabic. Jesus was a Jew so logic goes to follow Jesus was an Arab.
|
|