|
Post by stray on Jul 27, 2007 9:08:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by legaltender on Jul 27, 2007 9:32:40 GMT -5
The victim was also black. Not that it matters to the forum.
|
|
Felix
Global Moderator
Tepid One
Happy Morning
Posts: 4,137
|
Post by Felix on Jul 27, 2007 9:50:29 GMT -5
A horrific crime whatever the race of attackers or victims. Black on black crime generally is more common than black on white, I believe.
I know of a young man who some years ago suffered a similar beating outside a restaurant on MLK here. He was on his way home from a second-shift job, and due the next day to register at Chattanooga State. He had been in trouble as a juvenile, but had straightened out, got his GED and tested as quite intelligent. After he finally got out of the hospital, he could not care for himself and retained just enough awareness to ask his social worker, "I used to be smart, didn't I?"
He was black. His attackers were black. It's a sick world, all right, but simply assigning causality to color or religion or national origin does nothing to help understand evil.
|
|
|
Post by dirtymc on Jul 27, 2007 12:49:43 GMT -5
Black on Black crime is still at a all time low ion Ider, Al. But in the near future I see Yellow on Yellow being a issue.
|
|
|
Post by tncoaster37 on Jul 27, 2007 12:58:22 GMT -5
Actually, the vitcim was white since I read the story on another site and they showed the victim in the hospital room. It just proves that blacks are just as racist as another race.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 27, 2007 13:43:30 GMT -5
The race of the victim or the perpetrators has no bearing on this incident. Read the AJC regularly and you will see that these crimes are just as prevalent, in the Atlanta Metro Area, across racial lines.
|
|
|
Post by tncoaster37 on Jul 27, 2007 18:38:12 GMT -5
JIT, I read about this the day after it happened. Around 20 others was involved in this beating. One of the amusement park websites had it on the main page within 24 hrs after it happened. It does have a bearing on this since the blacks was looking for any white person to beat up. It's a racial crime plain and simple. JIT, in your world it's ok for the blacks to beat up on whites and not have it called a hate crime but when the reverse happens then all hell breaks loose and the blacks want the white's hung up. It's a double standard you are playing with since.
|
|
|
Post by bernardjenkins on Jul 27, 2007 19:01:14 GMT -5
Sound like just a crime to me. We all are some color, so color may have been a small factor, but it is still a crime.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 27, 2007 20:15:01 GMT -5
Coaster, I live in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area. I've been bombarded with this case every time I turn on the news since day one. But I've also been bombarded with news like this and this on a daily basis also. We have black on white, black on black, white on white, white on black, brown on white, black on brown, yellow on yellow, red on black and rainbow on green crime down here. It usually isn't because of the color, it's because we are a large urban and suburban district with a diverse population crowded together with all the problems that entails. We have enough problems with crime without trying to add race to the mix.
|
|
|
Post by stray on Jul 27, 2007 23:06:45 GMT -5
Sound like just a crime to me. We all are some color, so color may have been a small factor, but it is still a crime. Here's the thing: Were it a group of whites out looking for a black...or jew...or whatever species....it would have been a HATE crime... ...but since it's yet another crime committed by the government's pet negroes...it's not. One of the huge issues I have is the 'hate crime' nonsense. Why in the hell are certain crimes escalated? Aren't all violent crimes a 'hate crime' in essence?
|
|
|
Post by legaltender on Jul 27, 2007 23:28:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tncoaster37 on Jul 28, 2007 8:14:16 GMT -5
Ex, the fact is that blacks feel like they are entitled to break lines. I can remember back in the 70's the same thing happened and they didn't do anything to stop it. It only proves my point which I have been trying to make and which Lincoln made back in the 1860's. that blacks and whites should never occupy the same continent.
|
|
|
Post by legaltender on Jul 28, 2007 9:21:05 GMT -5
Someone broke in line in front of you "back in the 70's," going to prove blacks and whites should never occupy the same continent.
Well argued.
|
|
|
Post by bernardjenkins on Jul 28, 2007 9:41:39 GMT -5
Where are we going to live if not on the same conitnent? That sure does not leave alot of space. Boy, just think of the bs that would cause!
|
|
|
Post by stray on Jul 28, 2007 10:59:00 GMT -5
Africa has plenty of land that is habitable yet uninhabited. It's where they came from and it's where they can go back to.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 28, 2007 11:05:36 GMT -5
Stray, you are sounding more like Abraham Lincoln every day.
|
|
|
Post by stray on Jul 28, 2007 11:08:47 GMT -5
There's good and bad in all of us.
|
|
|
Post by bernardjenkins on Jul 28, 2007 11:42:45 GMT -5
Should we go back to Europe? That's where most of us came from!
|
|
Felix
Global Moderator
Tepid One
Happy Morning
Posts: 4,137
|
Post by Felix on Jul 28, 2007 12:12:59 GMT -5
Stray observed: There's good and bad in all of us. Yep. Means there's still hope for me and thee, Rev. Straylight.
|
|
|
Post by stray on Jul 28, 2007 22:31:42 GMT -5
If the 'guvment' wanted to send my white ass back to Ireland.....I probably wouldn't put up too much of a fight about it to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by dirtymc on Jul 29, 2007 14:12:29 GMT -5
Abraham Lincoln rules
|
|
|
Post by bernardjenkins on Jul 29, 2007 14:34:47 GMT -5
In the hereafter maybe.
|
|
|
Post by dirtymc on Jul 29, 2007 20:14:38 GMT -5
maybe
|
|