BlackFox
Senior Forumite
Stay thirsty my friends
Posts: 4,496
|
Post by BlackFox on Mar 19, 2012 21:13:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by apriled on Mar 19, 2012 21:43:53 GMT -5
I can and will vote R. The Republican party is the most friendly political organization in town and historically had more female Chairs than the Dem Crutchfield Cartel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Mar 20, 2012 6:00:57 GMT -5
Ah, so having more chairs means they're better towards women, despite so many of the bills they've been sponsoring nation wide?
No, I'm no more a fan of the Democrat leaning right now, but I am personally far more likely to feel the effects or see the effects harm my nieces from those bills than most of the silliness put forth elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Mar 20, 2012 6:30:05 GMT -5
This bill has no reason to be. If reasonable Republicans don't swat it down and then ridicule its sponsors I will have lost the last bit of confidence I may have ever had in the Republican party.
|
|
BlackFox
Senior Forumite
Stay thirsty my friends
Posts: 4,496
|
Post by BlackFox on Mar 20, 2012 7:47:58 GMT -5
Obviously this a nationwide effort on the part of the GOP to go full in on the culture war. I don't see how alienating over half of the voters is a winning strategy, but ok.
Oh, I know. They actually THINK that the church going women in America actually agree that abortion and contraception should be illegal because they show up at church on Sunday and that's what is being preached. Got news for you boys, a lot of women are hypocrites too. They may not want their neighbor to get an abortion, but it's a different matter when they get pregnant by the pool boy or their daughter gets knocked up by a negro.
Access, they wants it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Half-Tard on Mar 20, 2012 9:52:46 GMT -5
She's a man baybee!!! Keep em pregnant and dumb only in the South
|
|
JC
Full Forumite
No Messiah
Posts: 1,919
|
Post by JC on Mar 20, 2012 11:04:28 GMT -5
The party of no is quickly becoming the party of ho.
Republicans - keeping their pimp hands strong.
|
|
TNBear
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,285
|
Post by TNBear on Mar 20, 2012 19:33:57 GMT -5
One guess why they have such strong hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by coffeeshooter on Mar 21, 2012 6:32:34 GMT -5
Unbelievable.  It seems to me that HIPAA laws could somehow put a stop to this. Hopefully this is just grandstanding on the part of this Matthew Hill fellow. The Life Defense Act of 2012, sponsored by state Rep. Matthew Hill (R-Jonesboro), mandates that the Tennessee Department of Health make detailed demographic information about every woman who has an abortion available to the public, including her age, race, county, marital status, education level, number of children, the location of the procedure and how many times she has been pregnant. Each report would also have to include the name of the doctor who performed the procedure. |
|
JC
Full Forumite
No Messiah
Posts: 1,919
|
Post by JC on Mar 21, 2012 17:11:37 GMT -5
Ya know, I think I might just join the Control the Vaj party.
I can think of nothing better then having mandatory emissions testing on those things. Ones that pass will receive a yearly decal that must always be displayed in plain view on the butt.
And maybe impose maintenance and upkeep requirements like HOAs will do for lawns.
Anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Mar 21, 2012 19:40:16 GMT -5
Only if we can also publish any venereal diseases men have and if they require "male enhancement" drugs to perform or are viril without medical intervention.
|
|
|
|
Post by professorx on Mar 21, 2012 20:07:49 GMT -5
Only if we can also publish any venereal diseases men have and if they require "male enhancement" drugs to perform or are viril without medical intervention. If I read the story right they are only going to publish the doctor's information, not the patient's. Right or wrong, your analogy is a little off. This infomation is probably pretty easy to find already... |
|
|
|
Post by Tsavodiner on Mar 21, 2012 21:05:09 GMT -5
Only if we can also publish any venereal diseases men have and if they require "male enhancement" drugs to perform or are viril without medical intervention. I think you're confusing "viral" with "virilE", and have suffered the inevitable, predictable results.  |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Mar 21, 2012 21:10:09 GMT -5
Only if we can also publish any venereal diseases men have and if they require "male enhancement" drugs to perform or are viril without medical intervention. If I read the story right they are only going to publish the doctor's information, not the patient's. Right or wrong, your analogy is a little off. This infomation is probably pretty easy to find already... The way I read it they are going to publish such detailed information, county by county, that it won't be all that hard to determine who each person in a county was who had the abortion even though they don't publish the woman's name. There is no reason in the world to publish this information for public consumption other than as a way to attempt to shame women out of getting an abortion. While I'm all for reducing the abortion rate in this country this is not the way to accomplish this. |
|
|
|
Post by wheels on Mar 22, 2012 12:24:21 GMT -5
The way I read it they are going to publish such detailed information, county by county, that it won't be all that hard to determine who each person in a county was who had the abortion even though they don't publish the woman's name. in very limited circumstances, possibly. but i doubt it would be possible in most cases. i don't have a problem with collecting some of that data for statistical purposes (which i'm guessing they already do), but i don't think it should be released to the public. |
|
|
|
Post by Half-Tard on Mar 22, 2012 18:57:48 GMT -5
Whe all you GOP members are siiting back come November and say Why couldn't we beat that man. Remember shit like this. Thank you for your unbridled stupidity and lack of leadership. 4 More Years...rock-n-roll
|
|
|
|
Post by apriled on Mar 22, 2012 21:32:58 GMT -5
Aceman,
I would not under estimate the GOP and conservatives mission to (R)emove Pres. Obama. Call GOP stupid, dumb, they are indeed on a mission. Gallup polling has consistently shown that Romney can take Obama. I realize that polling is rough estimating. The GOP is conducting national census of registered R's. They are no asleep this time around. They ain't playin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Half-Tard on Mar 23, 2012 0:37:59 GMT -5
Too what alienate a large voting block of women. Not underestimating that at all They're doing it. With you being a women? To stand by and watch your party ass rape women with no lube to try and get a vote of the jesus freaks good luck. You're done. Really Mitt Romney that's the best you can do. Thank you. Remember the classic hit from hall & Oates "you're out of touch". Go on push women back in the stone age. Hope it's worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Mar 23, 2012 4:44:54 GMT -5
Between that and the dog.....
|
|
|
|
Post by rstewart on Mar 23, 2012 8:58:41 GMT -5
Aceman,
Wanna put your $ where your mouth is? I still wager that whomever the Republican candidate is, he/she/it will get more votes than Uncle Barack in TN. So maybe they aren't quite as crazy as you think or could it be they are crazy like a fox?
|
|
|
|
Post by Half-Tard on Mar 23, 2012 13:51:05 GMT -5
I'll bet you President Obama will get more votes than Romney in Mass. Romney's home state.
Wow that's a great bet for you. I was born at night but not last night. This is a commie red state.
|
|
|
|
Post by apriled on Mar 24, 2012 9:25:34 GMT -5
Aceman,
The source article initially posted is from the Huffington Post, the Demist media. The GOP platform is anti abortion, and the Dem platform is pro choice. Women do not care what a political party thinks on the issue of abortion. You find a mix of opinions in both parties that are more connected to science and religious beliefs.
In fact, I cannot find one person that blindly follows all beliefs in their political party. I am pro union and organized labor, and a GOP party member. Unions getting into the political campaign business and supporting only Dems, has alienated the GOP and cause a backlash an anti union movement. I digress.
You will also find Dems that are anti abortion. So, to attribute your "vagina" comments to GOP is absurd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Half-Tard on Mar 24, 2012 11:31:14 GMT -5
Perception is reality in this day and age. Which party has made womens reproduction rights an issue lately? Instead of jobs and the economy like they promised when they swept the house and a majority of state offices as well.
Only job movement that was made was to break unions. How many jobs did that create?
We got 10 commandments in legislation again, how many jobs will that create?
We got the old evolution and creationism again how many jobs will that create?
Guns in parking lots, how many jobs will that create?
The above abortion bullshit, how many jobs will that create?
Agenda 21, how many jobs will that create?
good luck in 2012....
|
|
|
|
Post by apriled on Mar 25, 2012 14:29:05 GMT -5
"Which party has made womens reproduction rights an issue lately?" The anti-abortion vs. pro choice has been on the front burner, since I can remember. In the 70's, NOW was the leader on the pro choice, not the Dems. BTW, their 70's spokesperson was the most awesome speaker. www.now.org/ |
|
|
|
Post by ssmynkint on Mar 25, 2012 16:57:39 GMT -5
You mean Pat Ireland? Great gal: sharp, determined, politic. I remember her rage RE: wage etc. discrimination when she was a stewardess (aka, flight attendant). Drove her into law to fight the system.
|
|
|
|
Post by apriled on Mar 26, 2012 7:04:06 GMT -5
I am having a senior moment. I remember being really moved by the NOW spokesperson of the late 70's. Women have come along way. I vote for them, www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeOHPfsCtFo |
|
tq8oBMsj(qiGRg~~_3.JPG)