Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 0:28:18 GMT -5
Aby Dorin Crciun in a case having as its object the settlement of the request for revision of a decision of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal which admitted the appeal filed by the defendant. . In the justification of the exception of unconstitutionality it is argued in essence that the criticized legal provisions are unconstitutional to the extent that it is interpreted that the decision was legally communicated to the chosen procedural domicile and not actually to the domicile of the party indicated in the action. Thus it is appreciated that art. para. of the.
Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional if the reviewerCountry Email List was not personally notified of the decision whose review he requested immediately after the judgment was pronounced and art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional if it is interpreted that the requirement to communicate it to the procedural domicile chosen during the course of the trial and not actually to the partys domicile is fulfilled. . t is pronounced signifies the end of the process and its communication must be carried out both at the domicile of the party and at his chosen one. . The Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section I civil and for cases regarding labor conflicts and.
Cocial insurance considers that the exception of unconstitutionality invoked is unfounded the criticized legal provisions representing procedural norms that regulate the obligation to communicate the decision by the court ex officio as well as the deadline for justifying the revision request respectively the sanction for noncompliance with this deadline. . According to the provisions of art. para. from Law no. the conclusion of referral was communicated to the presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament the Government and the Peoples Advocate in order to express their views on the exception of unconstitutionality raised. . The government appreciates that the.
Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional if the reviewerCountry Email List was not personally notified of the decision whose review he requested immediately after the judgment was pronounced and art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional if it is interpreted that the requirement to communicate it to the procedural domicile chosen during the course of the trial and not actually to the partys domicile is fulfilled. . t is pronounced signifies the end of the process and its communication must be carried out both at the domicile of the party and at his chosen one. . The Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section I civil and for cases regarding labor conflicts and.
Cocial insurance considers that the exception of unconstitutionality invoked is unfounded the criticized legal provisions representing procedural norms that regulate the obligation to communicate the decision by the court ex officio as well as the deadline for justifying the revision request respectively the sanction for noncompliance with this deadline. . According to the provisions of art. para. from Law no. the conclusion of referral was communicated to the presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament the Government and the Peoples Advocate in order to express their views on the exception of unconstitutionality raised. . The government appreciates that the.