|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Jan 21, 2010 13:13:38 GMT -5
I am just SICK TO DEATH of the bias shown by our local paper! Why, just this morning on the very FRONT PAGE of the Lifestyle Section, they had a totally biased article entitled "3-D Baby!" The NERVE of these extremists! EVERYONE knows that those are just lumps of fetal tissue. They are NOT babies until they actually breathe outside the womb. ANY similarity to ACTUAL babies is obviously a hallucination derived from a sick, twisted right-wingnut mind! Too much tea in their systems, if you ask me.
|
|
RuneDeer
Senior Forumite
I look pretty young, but I'm just back-dated.
Posts: 2,937
|
Post by RuneDeer on Jan 22, 2010 5:58:01 GMT -5
The baby will be born, will grow up to smoke pot, and then the world will be back in balance for you. Just be patient.
|
|
joedog
Senior Forumite
Posts: 2,830
|
Post by joedog on Jan 22, 2010 6:06:15 GMT -5
But LR if the mother wanted to give birth to that child. Then some one killed that mother and the child was also lost they would be charged with two counts of murder. It has been set as precedent.
You should know that......
|
|
|
|
Post by Conservator on Jan 22, 2010 8:46:47 GMT -5
I hear you LR... it's the over bearing bible belt we live in. That moral compass we all possess, but those religious freaks have to remind us of. Sons of bitches. On a side note - we got to see our baby's heartbeat on Dec. 1st at only 7 weeks old. An amazing sight.
Another 4 weeks till we can find out the sex. He or she is due mid July.  |
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Jan 22, 2010 13:12:42 GMT -5
"It has been set as precedent."
Unfortunately, another precedent has been set for sadder circumstances.
|
|
JC
Full Forumite
No Messiah
Posts: 1,919
|
Post by JC on Jan 22, 2010 13:20:04 GMT -5
I would actually call our TFP somewhere in the middle.
Depending on what reporter, and what day you read it, you may find a very liberal piece, or a very conservative piece.
I guess we just chose to actually see the things we don't agree with more then the others...
|
|
Jay
Senior Forumite
Captain Cupcake
Posts: 5,070
|
Post by Jay on Jan 22, 2010 15:46:05 GMT -5
Fetus = Human life.
It's so sad that some people would diminish the meaning of this life by saying it's "lumps of fetal tissue."
|
|
Scarlet&Gray
Senior Forumite
Mr. Ohio
In our honor defend we will fight to the end
Posts: 2,902
|
Post by Scarlet&Gray on Jan 22, 2010 16:21:38 GMT -5
It looks more like shrimp cocktail.
|
|
zodiacman
Full Member
I'm comin' to get you!
Posts: 273
|
Post by zodiacman on Jan 22, 2010 21:06:11 GMT -5
Why were they choosing to spotlight "3D" babies? Are they dimensionalist against Maggie Simpson or the countless other babies who exist on two dimensional realms? Or what about 4D babies? Is our newspaper afraid of babies who can control space and time? STOP THE HATE!
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeydokey on Jan 24, 2010 10:38:11 GMT -5
I remember when Stoney, on the radio, one time, said that his unborn children were just tumours that could be removed at his or their mother's whelm, he's such a great guy, no-wonder WGOW loves him.
|
|
|
|
Post by gridbug on Jan 25, 2010 12:25:03 GMT -5
Tumor, fetus, whatever...
I just hope it was clothed. Child porn is bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jan 25, 2010 13:09:32 GMT -5
I wonder if someone displaying a picture of an aborted fetus at one of these protests could be successfully prosecuted for child pornography? By their own admission, usually on the sign, this is a picture of an unclothed child that is being exploited.
|
|
|
|
Post by Conservator on Jan 25, 2010 14:16:58 GMT -5
So any pic of your child un-clothed is child porn? C'mon.
(disregard if you were trying to be funny)
|
|
printemps
Full Forumite
And a bag of chips.
Posts: 1,545 
|
Post by printemps on Jan 25, 2010 14:21:36 GMT -5
I wonder if someone displaying a picture of an aborted fetus at one of these protests could be successfully prosecuted for child pornography? By their own admission, usually on the sign, this is a picture of an unclothed child that is being exploited. No, but they do have to get the fetus' permission. |
|
|
|
Post by Conservator on Jan 25, 2010 17:17:36 GMT -5
You mean parental consent from the mother who tossed it out for financial or social gain.
|
|
|
|
Post by LimitedRecourse on Jan 25, 2010 17:52:12 GMT -5
Legally, once you throw your trash away, you are bereft of ownership.
|
|
|
|
Post by daworm on Jan 25, 2010 18:02:41 GMT -5
Financial gain? I thought those procedures cost money, not that you got paid for them...
Of course, to some, every single sperm is sacred (cue Monty Python), in which case I'm a mass murderer several billion times over.
|
|
JC
Full Forumite
No Messiah
Posts: 1,919
|
Post by JC on Jan 26, 2010 1:02:35 GMT -5
Someone remind me never to shake Worm's hand!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dallas on Jan 26, 2010 17:45:36 GMT -5
Someone remind me never to shake Worm's hand! I thought that was a given. |
|
|
|
Post by gridbug on Jan 27, 2010 12:30:32 GMT -5
Someone remind me never to shake Worm's hand! He obviously needs no help shaking it... |
|
|
|
Post by daworm on Jan 27, 2010 17:07:51 GMT -5
Don't touch my gym socks either.
|
|
|
|
Post by el Gusano on Jan 27, 2010 22:11:09 GMT -5
I'll just leave them stuck to the wall then.
|
|
