pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589 
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:39:09 GMT -5
Now that JiT has suggested that you are speaking in metaphor, you'll need to clarify. Do you mean literal or metaphorical bjs? Are you suggesting that men only give one or the other but not both? No. I am trying to better understand exactly what WK is asking. Thanks for trying to help her out. It's quite chivalrous, but I do think that she can answer for herself. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:41:06 GMT -5
Yes, but JiT has indicated that "blow jobs" has a non-sexual meaning.
I'm trying to understand whether you are talking about the actual act of fellatio or some other vague, undefined act. If it's the latter, I'd like to know what you are talking about.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:42:55 GMT -5
Um, JiT accused Dan Johnson of giving blow jobs on this thread. Of course, he didn't specify whether he is talking about the act of fellatio or something else.
Care to clarify on that point, JiT? It's your accusation - give us the deets!
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 14:56:18 GMT -5
Um, JiT accused Dan Johnson of giving blow jobs on this thread. Of course, he didn't specify whether he is talking about the act of fellatio or something else. Care to clarify on that point, JiT? It's your accusation - give us the deets! I think I've been very clear. The point is that this thread started out on a very sexist note and has only gone downhill from there. I very seriously doubt that Missy Crutchfield obtained her current job by giving out sexual favors but that's what has been proposed. Even if she had, though, I would find that much more respectful than giving up every bit of one's dignity in order to act as an apologist for someone by making seriously flawed arguments that deserve every bit of the ridicule that they got. I would much rather be someone's whore than their clown. I don't think Ms Crutchfield has been anyone's whore. I do know some people have been a clown for the mayor. Now, Pompey, do you support the continued sexist nature of this thread? |
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 14:59:24 GMT -5
Apparently it IS too difficult for you then. You're ability to over complicate things is noted.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:01:11 GMT -5
So let's get this straight:
You advance a very broad definition of the term "blow job" that accommodates non-sexual definitions and then you turn around and berate others for making insinuations that ALSO have non-sexual definitions?
Sounds like cut and dried hypocrisy to me.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:02:48 GMT -5
Apparently it IS too difficult for you then. You're ability to over complicate things is noted. And your failure to understand the difference between a metaphorical accusation and a literal one is also noted. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 15:06:14 GMT -5
So let's get this straight: You advance a very broad definition of the term "blow job" that accommodates non-sexual definitions and then you turn around and berate others for making insinuations that ALSO have non-sexual definitions? Sounds like cut and dried hypocrisy to me. So you do support the continued sexist nature of this thread. Noted. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:13:01 GMT -5
So you do support the continued sexist nature of this thread. Uh, no. Anyone can read the thread and see that YOU are the only one who has openly insinuated that someone gave a "blow job" in return for a job - and that someone is a MAN. I see that more as libelous than sexist. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 15:21:44 GMT -5
So you do support the continued sexist nature of this thread. Uh, no. Anyone can read the thread and see that YOU are the only one who has openly insinuated that someone gave a "blow job" in return for a job.... |
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 15:22:56 GMT -5
First, I ever indicated a metaphorical definition. Try not to assume that JiT is the same person as Warkitty. We are actually hard to mistake by most normal people, but whatever.
Your buddy Smyn was the one insinuating favors with the "knee pads" comment in reply to "how she got her job." The rest piled on with references to her movie in an attempt to further the implications. Nice. Great. I'm sure the same folks would never consider making the same insinuation of a man which was the point which you seemed incapable of grasping.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:23:45 GMT -5
action=display&board=general&thread=27069&page=1#243674]Really? [/url][/quote] Yeah, really. Are you now arguing that there is a non-sexual definition of "blow job" but there is not a non-sexual definition of "knee pads"? Nice double standard there, church lady. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:27:14 GMT -5
Oh, I see. JiT indicated that the term "blow job" is non-sexual, so I was unclear why the term "knee pads" would be worse.
If ssmynkt had written "blow job" instead of "knee pads", would that have been OK? JiT seems to think so, since he thinks that "blow job" is non-sexual in this context, even going so far as to accuse a man of giving a "blow job" in order to gain employment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 15:35:51 GMT -5
Oh, I see. JiT indicated that the term "blow job" is non-sexual, so I was unclear why the term "knee pads" would be worse. If ssmynkt had written "blow job" instead of "knee pads", would that have been OK? JiT seems to think so, since he thinks that "blow job" is non-sexual in this context, even going so far as to accuse a man of giving a "blow job" in order to gain employment. Again, you are combining mine and Warkitty's post. She means what she means and I mean what I mean. She has asked about blow jobs of a strictly sexual nature. I'm taking the meaning to be more metaphorical. I don't know exactly what way other's in this thread may have been alluding to blow jobs but neither I nor Warkitty brought up the topic. Whatever, it's still a sexist thread and you seem to be supporting that. Have at it. I just think Ms Crutchfield should be allowed to stand or fall on her own merits without being called a whore... metaphorically or literally. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:38:48 GMT -5
What about Dan Johnson? You clearly indicated that he either metaphorically or literally gave a "blow job" to get employment.
It's OK to slander him while criticizing others for doing the what you assert is the same thing to Missy Crutchfield?
|
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 15:43:02 GMT -5
No, you asked for an example of a man who has given a blow job. JiT answered with an example of a man that has given a blow job.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 15:44:11 GMT -5
What about Dan Johnson? You clearly indicated that he either metaphorically or literally gave a "blow job" to get employment. It's OK to slander him while criticizing others for doing the what you assert is the same thing to Missy Crutchfield? You know, there is no way I could ever slander anyone with a post in this forum. Second, your continued frenzied support for the original tone of this thread only emphasizes your own misogynistic personality. I hope your mother is proud of you. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:47:41 GMT -5
No, you asked for an example of a man who has given a blow job. JiT answered with an example of a man that has given a blow job. But in that case it was a "non-sexual" accusation. I'm wondering why that's OK but using the term "knee pads" is somehow "not OK". Sounds like a double-standard to me. |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:50:04 GMT -5
You know, there is no way I could ever slander anyone with a post in this forum. Accusing someone of getting a job because they gave a "blow job" is a pretty good way to test that out. The misogynist on this thread is clearly you. YOU are the one accusing people of giving "blow jobs". Not me. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 15:51:59 GMT -5
You know, there is no way I could ever slander anyone with a post in this forum. Accusing someone of getting a job because they gave a "blow job" is a pretty good way to test that out. The misogynist on this thread is clearly you. YOU are the one accusing people of giving "blow jobs". Not me. You really need to look up the definitions of "slander" and "misogynist." |
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 15:56:19 GMT -5
You're the one effusively insisting that the initial tone is perfectly ok and attacking any attempt to point out the obvious sexism involved. Your campaign merely puts you in a position of defending the sexist attacks, indicating you approve of them.
My statements were a foil to show that sexism for what it was. That you're so focused on that foil and attacking it as "proof" of opposite sexism proves your blindness to the initial issue. Hence it is apparent your misogyny is thoroughly entrenched to such an extent that you refuse to even recognize it exists.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 15:56:46 GMT -5
You really need to look up the definitions of "slander" and "misogynist." And you need to look up the definition of "blow job". |
|
|
|
Post by ssmynkint on Jul 21, 2011 15:58:43 GMT -5
When is a bj not a bj?
Can one metaphorically not swallow?
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 16:01:49 GMT -5
You're the one effusively insisting that the initial tone is perfectly ok and attacking any attempt to point out the obvious sexism involved. Your campaign merely puts you in a position of defending the sexist attacks, indicating you approve of them. Complete nonsense. I condemn the attack on Ms. Crutchfield as well as the attack on Mr. Johnson. JiT is claiming that his attack is somehow "different", which is ludicrous and yet another example of his moral bankruptcy and obtuseness. Your logic is laughably out of whack. Try again. |
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 16:04:32 GMT -5
Oh NOW you say you condemn the attack on Ms. Crutchfield. Only NOW though. Up to now, you've been defensively saying it never happened.
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 16:05:36 GMT -5
Where did I claim that? Metaphorical or literal my attack was just as nasty. I don't recall saying otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 16:05:50 GMT -5
Wait, are you saying it's a condemnation to say a man has given a blow job at some point in his life?
So, you've got a problem with homosexual men? Gus will be happy to hear you agree with him on that!
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 16:06:22 GMT -5
Up to now, you've been defensively saying it never happened. I never said that. Can you read? |
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 16:07:22 GMT -5
Agreed.
Perhaps you should apologize to Mr. Johnson.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 16:07:45 GMT -5
If you condemn the attack on Ms Crutchfield then why did you demand for WK to name on man who gives blowjobs when she was making her point about how misogynistic this thread had become?
Sounds like your waffling to me.
|
|
