|
Post by ssmynkint on Jul 16, 2011 8:59:34 GMT -5
knee pads
|
|
|
Post by pictureman on Jul 16, 2011 11:11:54 GMT -5
Making another film, perhaps.
|
|
|
Post by Tsavodiner on Jul 16, 2011 16:07:55 GMT -5
WHY, WHY..
of ALL the misogynist, sexist, revanchist, BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLB (shakes foam from jowls making Yosemite Sam noises)
How DARE you impugn the star-studded rhinestone reputation of one of ChattaFrancisco's leading sycocitizens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by pictureman on Jul 16, 2011 17:15:25 GMT -5
"...the star-studded rhinestone reputation..." Ah! So you've seen the movie!
|
|
|
Post by Tsavodiner on Jul 16, 2011 18:18:57 GMT -5
I may be IN it!
Check with pompey or blackfox and see if they recognize my d#*@....
|
|
Bob
Global Moderator
Bird Geek
Posts: 7,029
|
Post by Bob on Jul 16, 2011 22:07:28 GMT -5
for self preservation reasons, I can't say anything about "her" ....
|
|
|
Post by augie47 on Jul 18, 2011 5:47:11 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2011 6:09:58 GMT -5
Good one, Augie!
|
|
|
Post by naturedude11 on Jul 18, 2011 7:18:24 GMT -5
But as missy herself would tell you, the information is inaccurate! As she told one of the little weekly papers a few years ago, "People say I make $100,000 or whatever, but what they don't tell you is, that after they take out taxes and stuff, I don't get anywhere near that kind of money."
She's a genius, I tell you.
|
|
|
Post by b33fj3rky on Jul 18, 2011 12:36:08 GMT -5
I do remember her and the lower-case thing. There was an article about it in the Free Press when she first announced the change. She said something about how she was doing it b/c she wanted to NOT draw attention to herself. Which, of course, makes perfect sense--show everyone how humble and selfless you are by changing your name to something weird and getting in the newspaper.
|
|
|
Post by naturedude11 on Jul 18, 2011 15:41:17 GMT -5
Yeah, she's never been one to attract attention to herself.
I think it was Missy O'Shea who did that.
|
|
Bryan Stone
Full Forumite
I'll give it six months.
Posts: 1,993
|
Post by Bryan Stone on Jul 19, 2011 1:18:13 GMT -5
at least she's hot
|
|
Babs
Senior Forumite
Diet Spryte
Even cuter?
Posts: 3,674
|
Post by Babs on Jul 19, 2011 9:16:09 GMT -5
Lukewarm, at best.
|
|
|
Post by wildman6767 on Jul 19, 2011 9:50:02 GMT -5
Missy has been on her knees at every job she has bene on even when she was at Chat. State in the 90's. She handled showed up for work and had a parking spot right next to Catanzarro
|
|
|
Post by naturedude11 on Jul 19, 2011 17:47:11 GMT -5
And at UTC, she didn't even show up for work that much....but got paid anyway.
And I agree with babs on the "lukewarm" comment. She's got some serious mileage on her.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 20, 2011 9:30:40 GMT -5
From what I understand she's a pretty good PR person with a lot of connections. That's worth something.
I don't understand putting her down for being able to secure good paying employment for herself. it seems she does alright for herself and who's to fault her for that? If there is a problem with the city spending that much on that job it looks to me like that's on the city, not on Ms Crutchfield.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 20, 2011 10:05:30 GMT -5
I'll contend that for the job she has having those connections and knowing how to use them are as valuable of a commodity as any other skill she might have.
And what does her daddy's criminal convictions have to do with her? Was she personally and knowingly involved in his crimes?
|
|
JC
Full Forumite
No Messiah
Posts: 1,919
|
Post by JC on Jul 20, 2011 10:33:03 GMT -5
What does she do that anyone else couldn't? I could do her "job" part time for 10k yr. Add $100 a week for a whore to blow the mayor.
And why does the city even need the EAC?
|
|
Bob
Global Moderator
Bird Geek
Posts: 7,029
|
Post by Bob on Jul 20, 2011 13:18:53 GMT -5
Justin you're right. She has her job(s) not because of her daddy but because of her daddy's influence (read that however you wish)
Offer me a fat pay check to do sit at a desk a few times a month and I'd take it. The problem most people have is she is paid with tax dollars. Still not her fault...
Will it change next election? I doubt it.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 20, 2011 13:27:48 GMT -5
Justin you're right. She has her job(s) not because of her daddy but because of her daddy's influence (read that however you wish) Offer me a fat pay check to do sit at a desk a few times a month and I'd take it. The problem most people have is she is paid with tax dollars. Still not her fault... Will it change next election? I doubt it. Regardless of how many hours she sits at a desk the real question is, "Does she bring $106K/yr of value to the city." I don't know the answer to that but I have an idea that she might. You say she has her job because of her Daddy's influence. I say it is due to her own influence. She knows people who are in a position to help the city and she has their ear. She's no spring chicken any more, I'm thinking she is pushing 50 if she isn't there already. She's no longer Daddy's little girl, she's her own woman now. Sure, her daddy introduced her to these people but she's made them her own contacts.
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 11:52:52 GMT -5
Why is it when a man gets hired to his level of incompetence he just gets called incompetent and left alone, but when a woman gets hired to her level of incompetence, everyone assumes she must have provided sexual favors to get there? Even the less attractive women get accused of that.
What, y'all don't think dudes give blow jobs or something? Cuz, they totally do.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 12:34:55 GMT -5
What, y'all don't think dudes give blow jobs or something? Cuz, they totally do. Please cite examples.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 12:40:07 GMT -5
What, y'all don't think dudes give blow jobs or something? Cuz, they totally do. Please cite examples. Dan Johnson
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:11:06 GMT -5
Are you asserting that Dan got his job through sexual favors? Really?
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 14:13:44 GMT -5
Are you asserting that Dan got his job through sexual favors? Really? Nothing was said about sexual favors. WK just said men give bjs also. All bjs are not of a sexual nature.
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 14:26:29 GMT -5
Are you asserting, pompey, that men never give blow jobs?
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:31:04 GMT -5
All bjs are not of a sexual nature. Oh, I see. So WK was talking in metaphor. Got it. It seemed like she was upset that folks were suggesting that women are accused of trading actual sexual favors for employment gain. Now it's clear that she was more concerned with the accusation of providing metaphorical sexual favors. Thanks for clearing that up.
|
|
pompey
Senior Forumite
No Oppressive Titles Allowed
Posts: 2,589
|
Post by pompey on Jul 21, 2011 14:32:40 GMT -5
Are you asserting, pompey, that men never give blow jobs? Now that JiT has suggested that you are speaking in metaphor, you'll need to clarify. Do you mean literal or metaphorical bjs?
|
|
|
Post by Justin Thyme on Jul 21, 2011 14:34:49 GMT -5
Are you asserting, pompey, that men never give blow jobs? Now that JiT has suggested that you are speaking in metaphor, you'll need to clarify. Do you mean literal or metaphorical bjs? Are you suggesting that men only give one or the other but not both?
|
|
|
Post by Warkitty on Jul 21, 2011 14:37:16 GMT -5
No, I stated flat out that men give blow jobs. It's a simple statement. I'm betting Action at the least will acknowledge having done so.
The objection I have is that simply because a woman is promoted to a level of incompetence, she's *accused* of giving blow jobs but men are never *accused* of same. Since there's as much evidence of the one as the other, I can only assume the accusers don't believe men ever give blow jobs. I'm merely pointing out that incorrect assumption.
Is that too difficult for you to follow?
|
|